Sharing the full data sets underlying the results in your article brings many benefits. It enables reuse, reduces research waste, and promotes collaboration. Greater transparency increases trust in research results by allowing results to be independently verified. These benefits lead to a more reliable evidence base and a healthier world.
BMJ do not consider the deposition of data, including clinical trial data, in recognised repositories to be prior publication.
Many funders now require that the data sets from the studies they fund be shared. A list of research funders that mandate data archiving is provided by SHERPA/JULIET.
All BMJ journals require a Data Availability Statement for any submitted research articles. The requirements for data sharing is dependent on the policy the Journal adopts.
BMJ has three policies on data sharing:
Tier 1:
Tier 2:
Tier 3:
Information about what policy each BMJ Journal adopts can be found on this table.
All BMJ Journals require a Data Availability Statement for any submitted research articles. On submission, authors are asked to select at least one of the standardised Data Availability Statements text options below in bold as applicable and to supplement these statements with additional information as noted in the guidance below. Authors can select more than one statement if they have data under different conditions. The ICMJE recommendations provide further guidance on how to compose a rich statement.
These statements will be published under the header ‘Data Availability Statement’ within the footnotes section of the final published article.
All data that are publicly available and used in the writing of an article should be cited in the text and the reference list – whether they are data generated by the author(s) or by other researchers.
Data citations should include author(s), title, data repository, the document version (e.g. most recent date modified), the Digital Object Identifier (DOI) and should follow BMJ reference style.
Add [dataset] as a prefix immediately before the reference, so we can properly identify it as a data reference; this identifier will not appear in the published article.
Example:
[dataset] [52] Wang G, Zhu Z, Cui S, Wang J. Data from: Glucocorticoid induces incoordination between glutamatergic and GABAergic neurons in the amygdala. Dryad Digital Repository, August 11, 2017. https://doi.org/10.5061/dryad.k9q7h
For clinical data (Individual Participant Data) we request that you use controlled access repositories, such as clinicalstudydatarequest.com, the YODA project, or Vivli. Please see this article for current practical guidance on clinical trial data sharing.
For pre-clinical data we recommend using recognised subject-specific repositories, such as GenBank, where relevant and available.
There are also a number of recognised, general repositories in which to deposit data, for example, DRYAD, OSF, FigShare, Zenodo and Science Data Bank . FAIRsharing and re3data.org provide a curated list of repositories.
We encourage you to make available as much of the underlying data from your article as possible (without compromising participant privacy), but at least the minimum data required to reproduce the results presented in the associated article.
We consider any files generated by your research as constituting relevant data. This may be raw or processed data. Examples include (but are not limited to):
To enable reuse and enhance reproducibility, all data should be shared using the sources file in which they were originally generated, for example:
Data should not be shared in any way that could compromise participant anonymity or privacy, and data should not be shared if that would require the authors to break any laws or licensing agreements. If the data used were licensed from a third party, the data availability statement should explain how to obtain a licence for that data.
Where a research community in a particular field has established standards for what, where, and how data should be shared, we expect authors to meet those.
While data sharing is not mandatory in most of our journals, BMJ reserves the right to request at any time confidential access to any primary data needed to reproduce the article so that the results reported can be verified. Editors may also use data availability statements to inform their editorial decisions.
Where required, reports of clinical trials must include a commitment to make relevant anonymised patient-level data available on reasonable request (see this editorial in The BMJ for further explanation). This policy applies to any research article that reports the outcomes of a clinical trial of any type of intervention.
The International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE) requires that clinical trials that begin enrolling participants on or after 1 January 2019 must include a data sharing plan in the trial’s registration. We encourage all authors to follow this best practice, however this is compulsory on The BMJ. The ICMJE’s policy regarding trial registration is explained here<. Read more at BMJ 2017;357:j2372.
Data requesters should do the following: